DAY 1411 – If You Go To Court Wouldn’t You Make Your Best Case? Not Your Worst?*

• Wait. Maybe that was their best? OMG. That’s pathetic.

Sunday November 29, 2020

Election Day -26

51 Days until the Inauguration on January 20, 2021

I ask this question because if the case that just got thrown out of a Pennsylvania court is an example of the president’s best case I have to say, “Well, Golly Gee.”

Here’s an excerpt:

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

The three judge panel noted that the allegations and grievances amounted to “nothing more” than allegations that poll watcher were restricted and that mail-in ballots were allowed to be fixed by the voter for technical defects. 

Surprisingly, the judges did not mention that the poll watchers bitched about a woman not wearing a name tag and therefore said all the ballots she was inspecting should be thrown out. Likewise, they didn’t mention how some poll watcher seemed bent on intimidating those counting the ballots. Nor did they mention the poll watcher who wanted all the folded ballots thrown out. You know, the ballot that had to be folded to fit in an envelope. Why? Because they were folded.

Here’s another excerpt:

“The Campaign tries to repackage these state-law claims as unconstitutional discrimination. Yet its allegations are vague and conclusory,”

Huh. I guess if you rant and flap about that isn’t enough?

Wait, there’s more:

“It never alleges that anyone treated the Trump campaign or Trump votes worse than it treated the Biden campaign or Biden votes.”

The court went on to say that the Campaign’s claims have no merit. No Merit. Wow. Is that like, I dunno, making stuff up? Yeah. I think so.

The court also pointed out that :

“The number of ballots it specifically challenges is far smaller than the roughly 81,000-vote margin of victory. And it never claims fraud or that any votes were cast by illegal voters,”

The lawyer for Satan tweeted:

“The activist judicial machinery in Pennsylvania continues to cover up the allegations of massive fraud,”

However, it should be pointed out that all the lawyers were appointed by Republican presidents: 2 by W, and one by Satan.

The judges went through each claim and rejected it. Point by point they rejected whatever was claimed. 

Apparently, the judges thought it necessary to point out some FACTS and TRUTHS to these lawyers, who seemed to not know some basics. The judges wrote:

“Voters, not lawyers, choose the President. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections,”

Huh? Who knew?

The judges went on:

“The ballots here are governed by Pennsylvania election law. No federal law requires poll watchers or specifies where they must live or how close they may stand when votes are counted. Nor does federal law govern whether to count ballots with minor state-law defects or let voters cure those defects.

“Those are all issues of state law, not ones that we can hear. And earlier lawsuits have rejected those claims. Seeking to turn those state-law claims into federal ones, the Campaign claims discrimination. But its alchemy cannot transmute lead into gold.”

Ouch.

PS In the recount in Wisconsin that Satan paid for it was discovered that Joe Biden picked up votes. Way to Go Joe! 

PPS https://www.djtrumplibrary.com

PPPS Amusé Bouche – That’s French for “Amuse the Mouth.” In other words, “make it one bite.” Here, master chef Shelby has taken plantains, cooked them then smashed them into mini-muffin cups and baked them. Once baked she adds fresh tomato, avocado, orange pepper, and onion. Drizzled with olive oil. Fabulous. She described them as “Enjoy it because I’m never making these GD things again.”